Aussie-Doubleshot

A Story by Abishai100

Two 'characters' in the modern world negotiate the details of market-IQ depression.

A competition treatise inspired loosely by Above the Rim.

----

====

When Courier and Sampras had a confrontation in the 1995 Australian Open (men's tennis), creating a spiral-like match between a new-era star who'd been on the way down and another who'd been usurping his form again, it led to a 5-set stunner which however resulted in the winner (Sampras) losing to a simply resurrected Agassi in the final. This quarterfinal pre-app between Courier and Sampras therefore created images of what cast the 'excellence' of games/sports in the media-broadcast era through the 'vivid' lens of competition-IQ.

Nevertheless, despite the fact that the Courier-Sampras matchup was a game for the books that was ultimately overshadowed by the final resurrecting the once-media 'celeb' Agassi, the Australian arena for men's tennis typified why media-era broadcast sportsmanship highlighted the 'wonder(s)' of human competition. People simply started 'meditating' on the magic of competitiveness in the 'Earth-Outback' of Australia.

Two modern-day media-figures are debating precisely about the value(s) of this Courier-Sampras matchup, and the two 'characters' are a comics-writer/artist and chess-player and a Bollywood movie-studio baron who're differently weighing in on the Eastern appeal of the Western tennis-film Wimbledon in this social-media era of Facebook-IQ and theater-fanzines.

The comics-writer and chess-player is Amlan Satan and the Bollywood media-baron is a man named RajTaj, and the two decide to coach each other; one for chess, and the other for movie money. They converge and meet in a Facebook-commentary arena regarding the cinematic appeal of chess-play and how it might be compared to athletics/sports marketability in Hollywood.

SATAN: You really think sports-films are comparable to chess-cinema?
RAJTAJ: Sure; sports are more easily marketable, since they speak to general fitness!
SATAN: I concede that, but chess is much more emotion for intellectuals than sports-fanfare.
RAJTAJ: True; but Australian athletics (Courier-Sampras) draw out images of Earth diaries.
SATAN: Alright, but how do we then cast chess-storytelling as parallel to athletics-music?
RAJTAJ: Perhaps we might include 'models' for the parallax-beauties between chess/tennis.
SATAN: How's that?
RAJTAJ: We might feature a woman with an Aussie-bear in a feature about animalia-speak!
SATAN: That draws together fantasies about Earth-IQ and Aussie-adventurism, right.
RAJTAJ: This sort of 'cyber-storytelling' is conducive for the streamlining of 'human' dance!
SATAN: Right; it's all in the 'details' of re-presented Earth-distances.

Of course, these two characters were both right. What they drew separately and in-tandem was a way to cast sports-totem marketing and trophy-merchandising as 'representative' of a new era human/social diarism regarding consumerism distances. Why else do we cast sports-cards of celebrities as 'perfect' symbols of game-theory democracy? As Satan/RajTaj suggested, it's all in the design-details of orchestrated Earth-dollars!