You're writing from the outside in, as we're taught to in school, which is an inherently dispassionate approach. Great for reports, letters, and other nonfiction that employers need, but useless for poetry.
In this, you're talking to someone unknown, about the result of unstated mutual history. Meaningful to them, perhaps. But what's in it for the reader? They're learning that someone they know nothing about remembers a relationship they had with someone unknown?
My point is that instead of educating the reader on what matters to you, and what you feel, make the READER feel it. Don't tell them you cried, make THEM cry.
As an example, you say, "There was something about the warmth of your body," That's a declarative and accurate statement.
But...suppose you rephrase it as, "The warmth of your body against me, as shared passion faded into contentment, lingers still," it calls up remembered feeling in-the-reader, which triggers empathy.
You're writing from the outside in, as we're taught to in school, which is an inherently dispassionate approach. Great for reports, letters, and other nonfiction that employers need, but useless for poetry.
In this, you're talking to someone unknown, about the result of unstated mutual history. Meaningful to them, perhaps. But what's in it for the reader? They're learning that someone they know nothing about remembers a relationship they had with someone unknown?
My point is that instead of educating the reader on what matters to you, and what you feel, make the READER feel it. Don't tell them you cried, make THEM cry.
As an example, you say, "There was something about the warmth of your body," That's a declarative and accurate statement.
But...suppose you rephrase it as, "The warmth of your body against me, as shared passion faded into contentment, lingers still," it calls up remembered feeling in-the-reader, which triggers empathy.