I AM THE DANCER DANCING - I AM THE DANCE - Julius Fann, Jr

A Story by jufa

Am I the emanation of the Original Thinker? Is that who I am? Am I the one who gave an imaginary analysis of the dance I become consciously aware of in demonstration?

Jul 08, 2011#1

I am the dancer. I am the dancer dancing. I am the dancer dancing the dance. I am the dance.

   I am the dancer [ I AM not who created the dance]. I am the producer [interpreted thinker of what I theorize the dance to mean]. I am not the original thinker of the dance. Yet being the dancer dancing the dance, I become the thinker, thought, and objective interpreted projector of an activity that is a mystery over and above the thought interpreted by my finite mind.

The dance I produce is the production of the thought activity manifesting the object of my mind. I have now become the interpreter of the Originator Thinker's intent for creating the dance even though I do not know what that intent nor purpose was or is. So, who am I other than the dancer? Am I the emanation of the Original Thinker? Is that who I am? Am I the one who gave an imaginary analysis of the dance I become consciously aware of in demonstration?  Or just a manifested thought form unrecognizable which originally emanated from the Consciousness of Cause absent volume, breadth, or depth while I lived in as finite mind of the dancer I am?

My finite mind does not know why the dance was formed. The interpreter of the Original Thinker's thoughts does not know why I was formed as the dancer dancing the dance I am, or how I could emanate from the Original Thinker I AM when that I AM is beyond the Eye of human Comprehension?

Being the dancer, which is the emanation of I AM, then there must be a cause of purpose to produce the illusion of that which is believed to be finite because of visual effect but is infinite by Consciousness' cause. Sure, I can say I am the dancer dancing the dance; therefore, I am the dance I am dancing.  But this cannot qualify as a true statement because the dancer has not manifested the cause of substance which provides the thought essence of awareness of the dance, nor the ability to dance, no less allow the dancer to say in absoluteness what the dancer, dancing, and the dance's purpose and intent is.

Certainly, rhythmical movement is not a qualifier for the dance's purpose and intent that the dancer can make the claim I am the dancer dancing the dance. Nor does the thought of awareness of dancing make for that which produces true verification which makes what is alleged to be what is claimed. There is rhythmic movement in the branches and leaves of trees when swaggering winds blow and move through them. But If I am unaware of trees swaying the rhythm of the wind, this does not mean I purpose the wind, branches, or trees Being.

Neither does being the thinker interpreting the thought of being the dancer make the dancer and dance the truth of Consciousness' purposed affinity. I receive thought because I am a vehicle through which Consciousness highway through, but not in the observable form of that Consciousness I AM.

The thinker gives his life to the thought; the thoughts give that life to the object of the thinker's interpreted vision.  Thus, making the object of the thought the manifested subject matter of Consciousness. Does this make I AM the Original Thinker who gives thought to exist because of Its life?

Never give power to anything a person believes is their source of strength - jufa