Making sense of the Creation

It may be termed 'the Creation' but just of what is it comprised since there is to be something rather than nothing?

When one wonders, even today with advances of science discoveries, etc., how to make the best sense of existence, with its mutations, changing biochemistry, invisible or 'dark' realms, voids, infinitudes of life, quantum realm and its multifarious natures, migrating tectonic plates, ozone depletion, nonexistence, and why do beings go extinct. Putting that all together under one hat and have rational explanations is not easy at all.

When one considers all the above goings on that transpires, it is not easy to put forth a rational, comprehensive explanation. Over time many have attributed this to a "God" [and there are many attributed gods in global societies] among other reasonings. How to address that things have unscheduled changes, mutations, changing bodies/sexual orientation, or even the occasional meteoric strikes, extinctions with no timing sense, may have a rethought. For why are there "promised lands? What kind of being would want existing life to go extinct, what kind of planning is that? Imperfect? The "God", or whatever, needs more closely to be attributed. That these odd events occur with some randomness puts more a clearer nature on any "Creation" or "choose life" which leaves us no clue as to why the random events occur (other than by what is propounded). Hence, a rational explanation is left that the "God" or gods is also a being much as us that has concocted this existence, probably with no discernable order throughout. Such an apparent, perceived irregularity may present to the discerning mind that the events experienced have the consistency of being lab specimens. Deposited but must make their way on their own with the currents of unforeseen, variegated natures and those processes. And allow a more readily traceable and better reasoning to explain empirically why extinction comes about amongst multifarious lifeforms and situations.

It may be surmised that RNA-DNA and similar minute studies can go a long ways towards answering a lot of the appearance of twists and turns that are noted. Other than providing a better, empirical method toward tracing the nature of beings, it does not directly answer specifically how these come about and why multitudes of mutations, etc. come about.  It does not show any smooth, coherent process. Clearly, when all we experience and learn is reviewed, there is not found an ongoing original design or coherent plan by a superbeing with all the starts and stops. Indeed, how does one sensibly explain how things change in the body and the world without any prior notice to gauge by? Something plays us like lab specimens? Injecting myriads of changes, a large number which are not traceable but could be approached if we accept that something else does meddle. Does it act alone or is there a plurality? What does it base its knowledge on to produce or subtract changes and whether it is consistently seen through? What comprises its sentiency and bias. Does it really favor homocentricity? ("Made in the image of", but not the mind and the capacities thereof?) Why do some animals have ability to regenerate limbs and we do not?

Since some scientists also describe the origin as starting from a very small size, then it, like a test tube where the solution is deposited tightly constrained as through a dropper and then expands once beyond the aperture, could be also suggested. (Would this be applicable to quantum realm and its natures?) This could make tracing difficult but maybe better than other proposals. Otherwise, considering a creation, upon what did the creation start? What was before it? In many canonical texts, they  have that there was darkness. Not much of a leading clue there.

(It is also said that information cannot be created or destroyed. Likewise, in some canonical literature it is said that there was an important choice at inception and the favored choice was to choose life. This sounds more like a sentient being, but not all knowing or all powerful, favoring a development. Then, if there is consistency, in remiscence it is recalled there was a removal of other beings, making way for others, and in the grand history of the world there is extinction of other lifeforms and at various times with some that never knew about others. How is it some organisms can regenerate lost limbs and others not? How is it some organisms function naturally without a brain? For what reason are there sightless creatures, ocean bottom dwellers, or Is this an example of being consistent and following through with the (moral value?) " choose life" or are these evidence of some sentient being guiding an experiment? Or does microbe life, macrolife, etc. have to find their own way afterall? And there are billions more flies, bacteria than humans on this world.

This may be, perhaps, one of the viable ways to explain at least material existence in a traceable way in contrast with other put forth explanations. 

Note: the material herein is not necessarily a reflection of entropy of current societies.

Reviews

[Karen Redburn]

Interesting theory, are we but lab rats? Cheers!

[poetgurl]

Kind of intriguing and well put together.