The Atom, That Waits For Socialism To Defeat Capitalism

 

 

The Atom, That Waits For Socialism To Defeat Capitalism

                                    By Thomas Heath

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The history, of the socialist atom’s ideology. It has to be straightforward, naturally. Just as straightforward as humanity’s unemployment history. Not a dig, at humanity’s history of unemployment, but, just a reference to the condition of unemployment’s gothic. Such were the emotional intelligence. Such were the emotional truth. Such were the emotional matrix of this socialist atom. Not a higher, better meaning or identity of truth, emotional intelligence or matrix of humanity, according to this socialist atom.  Which waits. In a straightforward way. Like the gothic, of humanity’s unemployment, indeed, but with none of the anxiety, none of the sorrow.                        The socialist atom waits, because it loves humanity. Alas �" what exactly is it that this socialist atom waits for? What is it exactly?                                     In a nutshell, a lucky descriptive but not because of the natural association between nuts and atoms, it is for socialism to defeat capitalism. For socialist history to defeat capitalist history.

Barring the complexity (for a moment) wing to time’s politics, of the socialist history vs capitalist history paradigm, what might one wonder can actually be the full scope of socialism vs capitalism?                                               First, it isn’t lost on this socialist atom, that there’s a fundamental irony and contradiction of socialism conducting and being part of a vs. to begin with. And yes, it’s also not lost on the socialist atom that the sexuality of “ism” affords or would appear to afford the logic of said conduction and involvement. Nonetheless.      The history of, and this can perhaps be in ideological cahoots with the history theme aforementioned, the socialist atom is a system of having existed �" not lived; existed �" behind things. Things, such as news media. Social media, of its less geographical systematization essence, is more or even much more awkward an inclusion and reference than news media.                                Things such as the central government, both in practical and informational format. Incidentally, the informational version is a meaning to sheer hypothesis, to idea existence and nothing more.                 Things such as geography in general. Especially, geography in general, because of the human condition and animal condition of having to use geography to access life needs.                                              Things such as school education, political education (internet debate forums, can be permitted to be part of the political education index), vacation travelling etc. Thus, the history, of the socialist atom. Some of the topics, that have been favourite topics of the socialist atom are mathematics’ nth term protocol, where one has to interplay with the expression’s meaning of n and use the “common difference” system to formulate, or are computer keyboard typing. As to why the computer keyboard typing, it’s merely just down to the magic of knowing.                 The socialist atom, being a socialist left-wing idea, physics and matrix, doesn’t want to bring harm to any capitalist data. Thus why it waits. The practical angle, of the hope of the socialist atom, is to use an infinity angle to demolish capitalism. In other words, to hope that socialism �" the product, of the socialist atom �" can gain the ability to safely demolish capitalism on its own two legs. Indeed. Socialism, the famous failure socialism, is in fact a direct creation, outcome and product of this socialist atom (this atom that waits; unlike its creation, unlike its outcome and product, socialism, and that product’s success rate, its very own personal waiting won’t fail). The system, in which being a creator in the first place is able to logically beget immoral aura and immoral meaning, and this system’s relation to the socialist atom’s character and character of history. Null and void.

  At a beginning point in time, there was an atom. This atom was abused. It was abused by the sanity elements. Not to conflate matters, but the sanity elements’ composition of argument against the atom to be abused were ideas such as the rejection of metamorphosis, of positive and safe meaning of evolution, of development itself. The “not to conflate matters” area is a different area, relative to the socialist atom’s own disposition in regards to the atom that was abused. Which is despite the socialist atom’s conflation composition relative to its being a supporter of the contents of this atom’s abuse story minus actually being a supporter of the abuse story’s classification aka abstract and general classification meaning and existence.    The atom, of the abuse story was a complex of the ultimate progression. It had left the entire universe, and then much later on returned to it as a planet, to face its abusers head on.                       After a sinister story, after a sinister history, of being abused and tormented and opposed by the forces of sanity, i.e. the forces of news media, of institutional structuralism and of society frameworks in general, the abused atom would leave the universe, leaving behind its chemistry and physics rules, pertaining to its own body.                         Time after, this exit of the universe, the abused atom would return as a planet.                      Such were the myth! Such were the fabrication!          

It was all just a fiction; the abuse-planet story was indeed just a story, told or rather “communicated” by atoms to other atoms, including of course the socialist atom. The socialist atom, once having been bequeathed its very own trait, its very own expected tenet and character, of coming to learn of this abuse-planet tale, would clinically take it on board. Take it on board, that is, despite the compounding of the socialist atom having to feel a guilt complex, of being a user of the creation scheme obviously not being in sync with the abuse story’s ethos of progression, and the obvious horror inflicted on the planet-atom at the centre of the myth tale.                                  Who said atoms were simple?

The socialist atom waits. It waits, for a million years.          It comes across another atom, one it has never met before, a capitalist atom.                              From a polar opposite means and location of the cosmos, the capitalist atom would appear to the socialist atom. To the not discontent, but, to the not interest of the socialist atom either.                            Why both? Why, when of the will to overcome �" not ignore and overcome, just overcome �" the truth, indeed the new truth, of the capitalist atom having finally used movement as a condition of not negatively interfering with the atomic structure altogether, would in fact the socialist atom penalise the capitalist atom with both? That is, the non-interest and acceptance?

Why both?    The answer, to the inquiry by the capitalist atom from the socialist atom wouldn’t consist of the aforementioned guilt factor, pertaining to creation politics (the socialist atom having created socialism per se). Rather, it was owing to the socialist atom having actually implemented an echo technology representing the mood and emotion of unemployment of humanity, from humanity’s past.                      Indeed: the socialist atom, though not lost, on the magic of the capitalist atom’s humour sociology, was still nevertheless loyal to the system of the self-made and self-implemented echo tech, orientated to toward humanity’s unemployment.     Not of the interest inclination, not of the interest method, but, not of the discontent inclination either, the socialist atom would just listen. Just listen, to what the capitalist atom had to convey. Not so much advertise, but, convey:                                    Socialism, should team-up with capitalism, instead of taking on capitalism.                             Socialism. What actually is it? To say that on the surface, it’s an equilibrium system as a cliché, is a fair sort of sentiment. It is kind of fair, to designate the system of equilibrium �" of equilibrium’s pure version �" as a cliché aura. But then again, the conversation between the two atoms went on for a million years, and was able to consist of the clarity, sense and logic of unemployment vs. uselessness.

That’s an accomplishment, right there.                                 After a million years, the capitalist atom were to have failed by their proposition. The socialist atom would reject the agenda of the capitalist atom.                          Moreover: the socialist atom would put to use its own tools, its own agenda, humanity’s society unemployment and joblessness in order to deflect the evil incarnate presence of the capitalist atom altogether.                       From where? Hardly a rational cause for alarm, but time is time, so, from where? Where did the capitalist atom come from, the query’s impetus especially deriving from the fact that the capitalist atom hadn’t known of the mythic planet story?