The 2D Line, From The Universe Of Mathematics

A Story by trokanmariel33

A Story by Thomas Heath

In reality (the composition “In truth” isn’t ostensibly on offer here, because of the complex in which despite reality’s contradiction of reality being an infinity model truth’s own science nevertheless encapsulates the political sway of rights away from this disposition of reality), there was the potential for a kind of ultimate theory. A kind of all-encompassing, a kind of all-encapsulating, a kind of all-entrusting theory.

The theory’s composition, in truth, were that the force of chronology had the power to help evil. Not, despite chronology’s scope of remit, that is to say of the context in which the act of helping would be about trying to improve evil’s pure ideology. Just instead the sheer morality condition of giving help.

The internal science, of this system, alas of this “theory” system, was the three-way relationship between chronology, labour and quantity.

The line, aka the 2D line, had been an admirer of this theory. Whether it’d been the American Republican National Convention, or whether it’d been the private gardens of British houses in the 1700s that this very same 2D line had been helping and occupying, this theory regarding chronology had been utterly admired by the 2D line, if only that.

What do you notice? Is this a sexy sunglasses moment, for the line? No, to the second question, of course being the inevitable answer to the second question, the premise of the second question had been a dominating aura by the first question.

The first question’s “notice”, is regarding a theme of spatialness that links the RNC to the British houses of the 1700s. Essentially, the gambit of the 2D line as pertains to the chronology theme was predicated on a correlation value to do with the personal remit and nature of the 2D line.

Thus, was a sort of snapshot view of the 2D line. The 2D force had defined British houses during the 1700s, and had gone on to define the RNC of the 20^th century examples.

Now, the chronology-labour-quantity pact related to chronology helping give therapy and moral physics to evil wasn’t the contemporary concern of the 2D line force. The contemporary concern, the contemporary idea of target was a contextual much less scientific disposition. Namely, it was the sexiness of nationalism, albeit as an indirect side-effect meaning.

The internal units, aka the internal science world of the chronology theory’s universe were in fact a cause of why. Not, admittedly, a cerebral or ideological or religious cause of why; a physics construct of why, to do with why the 2D line now felt �" outside any time construct �" the ability �" not right, for such dimension contravenes the “physics construct” definition of the connection between the 2D line and the next special atmosphere �" to feel the political activation of the next special atmosphere.

This next special atmosphere. This sexiness of nationalism, that while wasn’t a synchronicity of political activation �" the previous aforementioned value �" being a political problem, was still nevertheless a political problem state of being that was accurate. The accuracy, the exact accuracy is that parts of reality’s matter were a very sensual nature. A very metaphorically erotic nature, where there is no underemphasis value regarding metaphorically. The catch, however, was that for the same reason that the 2D line had throughout the 20^th century been a definer for the American Republican National Convention, the political condition of the erotic nature being referenced was all too real!

The detail, was that the eroticism of connection to the 2D line was in fact incumbent on national expression. On nationalism’s sexiness.

Was nationalism sexy? The 2D line would wonder this, as not an honest separation from the agenda to do with wanting to help define the next special atmosphere (the sexy nationalism) but not as a dishonest meaningfulness either. Was nationalism sexy, in actual fact?

The Republican National Convention examples. The access, to their versions of visual beauty was a system of fallacy for the 2D line, in terms of the theme of access to version of visual beauty representing not so much an egalitarian principle but an equilibrium principle. Of course, were such complex an egalitarian principle then the fallacy sentiment would plausibly be rendered absent, by the 2D line.

It wasn’t lost on one, namely the 2D line, that the RNC were a value of nationalism. In this instance, however, the 2D line’s technique for the RNC were an idiosyncrasy of separation from the sexiness of nationalism unit with regards to the next step atmosphere.

Paradoxically, in this instance, the meaning of logic were to not use the RNC as a tenet.

Was nationalism sexy? An ultimate fear, and fear here may be logically seen as a misuse of the design by the 2D line, of the 2D line was the destruction of the cosmos via the knowledge of the sexiness of nationalism’s ulterior.

Hence the 2D line’s belief in the force behind the sexiness of nationalism; in the end, all things are entitled to their boredom.

This nationalism then. What was its crux, that acted as a drug to the 2D force? The answer, was the colour of cream. More specifically . . . it was the secret passageways that were coloured cream.

Indeed, this was where the nationalism element’s involvement in the intelligence became a puzzle. You see, the 2D line’s disposition of opinion about nationalism mucking up the cream intelligence fell into a usual pattern: the citation block.

The spatialness paradigm, that collectively defined the RNC in America and the British houses in the 1700s. For the 2D line, this back catalogue of intelligence of the 2D line now could translate and adapt itself to having the power to co-ordinate with the cream sociology’s citation block.

Not a lost hope, but not a meaningful cause either, that the 2D line could connect the spatial physics related to RNC and 1700 domestic British houses to the citation block universe’s truth on the basis that this truth involved an unknown yet perhaps discernible physics system, the 2D line would never dare however. The reason, for this apprehension, was the said fear syndrome pertaining to destroying reality creating a feeling of symmetry between the RNC and the cream sociology’s apparent incumbency on nationalism.

The 2D line, from the original world of mathematics (more specifically, from the original world of ratio proportion logic), would easily adhere.

From the original world, of ratios and proportion systems. From the original analysis, by the original ratio proportion world, that proximity’s relationship to logic were an utterly astounding system of application and demonstration. This were the historic code, built into the universe of the shape of the 2D line, used by the line for over billions of years. A code, which until now, had been a function of easy ability to penetrate into other systems.

Indeed, until now.

Would the fundamental ethos of proximity having a relationship with logic be a free mechanism, meaning that if used for the penetration into the bridge between the nationalism sexuality/sensuality and the cream sociology of buildings, would such utilisation create a fundamental deactivation of the interior of the 2D line?

Was it worth it �" using a central internal code, within the 2D line to break into the world of the buildings of the cream sociology? At the risk of self-destruction?

And then, there would come into existence a third way, as society’s usual applied science goes.

This way, this third way to become available to the 2D line; its composition would be “the aforementioned composition”, from the very beginning of this very story and its very text.

Could 4^th wall reality be sexy? The pattern, among other patterns of this tale, has been to ask if nationalism is sexy. Well, now, it isn’t lost on the 2D line from mathematics that it’s the least it can now do; to now reverse the formula, and to give 4^th wall reality and its left-wing insinuation the same treatment given to the RNC (a non-choice system, bequeathed to the 2D line of ratio proportion’s origin, indeed, but nevertheless a defunct criticism given the 2D line’s innate ability to enjoy reality in ways not applicable to human life and animal life).

Can 4^th wall magic be sexy?

At the beginning, of this story about a 2D line from the world of maths and ratio proportion, the poetic effect of the language “The theory’s composition, in truth” was used. Was demonstrated. Previously, there had been commentary on the 2D line being afraid of self-destruction via the route of putting to use the system of proximity’s relationship to logic. What if, in actual fact, the 2D line could now emulate this fear from its history and finally penetrate in a way that would protect the universe by destroying it? What if, in actual fact, the 2D line could now access the cream sociology (a modernity sociology, to clarify) using the 4^th wall system of page 2’s “The theory’s composition, in truth”?

Alas, before getting to the answer of that question, it’s perhaps pertinent to first delve a little bit more into the actual details of the cream world, the cream sociology, which so fascinated the 2D line.

How about this, for a further description of the world of cream buildings: namely, that when putting forward the question “Can 4^th wall reality be sexy?” regarding the logistics of how to penetrate the cream sociology in the first place (and by extension free the cream world of its nationalism) the actual morality is to not use the cream world for the deconstruction of the very reverse-effect question. In other words, respect the secret labour of the 4^th wall meta and don’t respect the secret aristocracy of the cream world’s sociology expression! Not until now, but, instead as of from now, the 4^th wall mystery can be kept a secret art.

Abandoning one’s agenda, especially when the target is a delicate agenda. Is this a universal tragedy? The cream world’s sociology expression may have been corruptible and susceptible to the national aristocracy formula, yet, was its delicacy still a tragedy formula in terms of being abandoned by the 2D line?

Post-deactivation, of its analytical apparatus to do with the cream sociology, the 2D line were to re-embrace its normal faculties. Its normal operation natures.

It would never activate any analysis over life rights for 2D shapes and 2D lines; the 2D line would recognise the institutional fallacy and artistic stupidity of doing so, of behaving this way.

Just normal operation �" perhaps this time for the DNC.

The End